SARMS VS. STEROIDS

/SARMS VS. STEROIDS

SARMS VS. STEROIDS

SARMS VS. STEROIDS

“I started using steroids with the intent of permanently switching to SARMS. SARMS are actually more anabolic in muscle cells then steroids, but they lack some mechanisms of actions that steroids provide. For example, multiple steroids lower cortisol, deca increases water retention and halotestin increases central nervous system activation. Because of this, I combine SARMS with other compounds that provide the additional mechanisms that steroids provide. In other words, SARMS are more effective at building muscle, but steroids are more effective at all the other things around it. That’s why going into this, my main experiment has been using SARMS with other compounds to activates` the same pathways as steroids. For example, arachidonic acid to increase inflammation in the muscle, or taking a supplement that lowers cortisol. SARMS doesn’t necessarily replace steroids completely because of the other effects’ steroids cause. For example, Winstrol is great at drying out physiques. However, I feel that SARMS has completely replaced the need for EQ, excess testosterone, Anavar, and primo.”

– DR. TONY HUGE

 

“Originally, I did not like SARMS until I learned that SARMS have pretty much-unlimited muscle-building potential, but you still need to incorporate other compounds to get the same benefits that steroids provide outside of the muscle cells. For example, we need estrogen for IGF-1. SARMS do not increase estrogen, and in fact, can even lower it. SARMS cannot completely replace steroids, but they can replace steroids on an anabolic level. We still need androgenic steroids for the other pathways.”

– COACH TREVOR

 

A. SARMS VS. STEROIDS SIDE EFFECT TABLE

 

A. SARMS VS. STEROIDS SIDE EFFECT TABLE (CONTD)

SARMS VS. STEROIDS